Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Woodrow, G.
Right arrow Articles by Turney, J. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Woodrow, G.
Right arrow Articles by Turney, J. H.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, Vol 12, Issue 3 524-527, Copyright © 1997 by Oxford University Press

ORIGINAL ARTICLES

The effect of arteriovenous fistulae in haemodialysis patients on whole body and segmental bioelectrical impedance

G Woodrow, B Oldroyd, MA Smith and JH Turney
Renal Unit, Leeds General Infirmary, UK.

BACKGROUND: Bioelectrical impedance (BIA) is a potentially useful method for measuring body water and soft-tissue composition in patients with chronic renal failure. The majority of whole body impedance is derived from the limbs with only a small contribution from the trunk, and thus abnormalities of the limbs could have an exaggerated effect on estimates of total body impedance. METHODS: This study investigated the effect of arteriovenous fistulae in the arm in haemodialysis patients on body composition measurement by whole body BIA. Body composition estimates from measurements on fistula and non-fistula sides of the body were compared and segmental impedance measurements of the arms were also performed. RESULTS: Whole body resistance was markedly lower on the fistula side of the body compared with the nonfistula side at 517.1 (124.3) omega compared with 561.5 (121.2) omega, P < 0.0005. This difference was accounted for by differences in the arm segments. This was attributed to swelling of the fistula arm which had a greater mid- arm circumference at 28.5 (2.1) cm compared with the contralateral side at 27.5 (2.0) cm, P < 0.05. This resulted in greater estimates for total body water from the fistula side at 38.6 (10.0) kg compared with 36.6 (8.6) kg from the non-fistula side, P < 0.05 and fat-free mass at 51.1 (11.8) kg from the fistula side compared with 49.1 (11.2) kg from the non-fistula side, P < 0.005. Estimates of body fat from the fistula side, 13.1 (6.9) kg, were less than the nonfistula side, 15.0 (6.0), P < 0.005. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of arteriovenous fistulae for vascular access in haemodialysis patients may have a significant effect on estimates of body composition by BIA.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Nutr Clin PractHome page
M. A. Kamimura, K. M. Majchrzak, L. Cuppari, and L. B. Pupim
Protein and Energy Depletion in Chronic Hemodialysis Patients: Clinical Applicability of Diagnostic Tools
Nutr Clin Pract, April 1, 2005; 20(2): 162 - 175.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.