Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (33)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brandstrom, E.
Right arrow Articles by Aurell, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Brandstrom, E.
Right arrow Articles by Aurell, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, Vol 13, Issue 5 1176-1182, Copyright © 1998 by Oxford University Press


ORIGINAL ARTICLES

GFR measurement with iohexol and 51Cr-EDTA. A comparison of the two favoured GFR markers in Europe

E Brandstrom, A Grzegorczyk, L Jacobsson, P Friberg, A Lindahl and M Aurell
Departments of Clinical Physiology, Clinical Chemistry, Radiation Physics and Nephrology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, S-413 45 Goteborg, Sweden; Corresponding author

Background: The aim of the present study was to compare the most commonly used GFR markers for clearance measurements, 51Cr-EDTA and iohexol, using two different methods for iohexol analysis, HPLC and X-ray fluorescence, referring both to the multiple-sample and single-sample calculations, using 51Cr-EDTA as the reference method. Methods: Forty-nine patients with an estimated GFR >40 ml/min were included. 51Cr-EDTA and iohexol were injected simultaneously and blood samples were taken 150, 195 and 240 min after injection of the respective marker. Results: The multiple-point clearances, determined from HPLC and X-ray fluorescence, compared to 51Cr-EDTA correlated highly (r=0.92 and 0.95 respectively). The results from single-point clearance comparison, iohexol measured by HPLC vs 51Cr-EDTA yielded a correlation of r=0.91 and an intercept statistically different from origo. Conclusions: Iohexol and 51Cr-EDTA are comparable as GFR markers for multiple-point clearance measurements. The single-sample method for GFR >40 ml/min can be used with a high accuracy. The precision and accuracy of X-ray fluorescence analysis of low concentrations of iohexol were less than those of HPLC. Care should therefore be taken when using X-ray fluorescence that the injected dose of iohexol should result in a plasma concentration level of iodine of at least 0.06 mg/ml at the time of blood sampling. Key words: Cr-EDTA clearance; iohexol; glomerular filtration rate
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
P. Delanaye, E. Cavalier, M. Froissart, and J. M. Krzesinski
Reproducibility of GFR measured by chromium-51-EDTA and iohexol
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., September 5, 2008; (2008) gfn496v2.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
N. J. Bird, C. Peters, A. R. Michell, and A. M. Peters
Effect of extracellular fluid volume on single-sample measurement of glomerular filtration rate
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., August 19, 2008; (2008) gfn437v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
N. J Bird, C. Peters, A R. Michell, and A M. Peters
Reproducibilities and responses to food intake of GFR measured with chromium-51-EDTA and iohexol simultaneously and independently in normal subjects
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., June 1, 2008; 23(6): 1902 - 1909.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
M. Tidman, P. Sjostrom, and I. Jones
A Comparison of GFR estimating formulae based upon s-cystatin C and s-creatinine and a combination of the two
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., January 1, 2008; 23(1): 154 - 160.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
P. C. Dagher, S. Herget-Rosenthal, S. G. Ruehm, S.-K. Jo, R. A. Star, R. Agarwal, and B. A. Molitoris
Newly Developed Techniques to Study and Diagnose Acute Renal Failure
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., August 1, 2003; 14(8): 2188 - 2198.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
A. G. Bostom, F. Kronenberg, and E. Ritz
Predictive Performance of Renal Function Equations for Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease and Normal Serum Creatinine Levels
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., August 1, 2002; 13(8): 2140 - 2144.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.