Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (9)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ingram, A.
Right arrow Articles by Churchill, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ingram, A.
Right arrow Articles by Churchill, D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, Vol 13, Issue 6 1452-1457, Copyright © 1998 by Oxford University Press


ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Effects of two low-flux cellulose acetate dialysers on plasma lipids and lipoproteins-a cross-over trial

A Ingram, A Parbtani and D Churchill
McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada; University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada; Corresponding author at: Suite 500, 25 Charlton Ave E, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada L8N 1Y2

Background: Studies have shown a beneficial effect of high-flux dialysis on lipids, lipoproteins and lipoprotein lipase (Lpl) activity. This has been attributed to improved clearance of Lpl-inhibitory molecules of middle molecular weight, but differences in flux or biocompatibility have not been addressed. We conducted a blinded cross-over trial of two cellulose acetate dialysers (AN140, Althin medical Inc. and CA210, Baxter Inc.) of similar flux (11 ml/h/mmHg transmembrane pressure) but with different clearances of larger molecules [AN140 sieving coefficient at mol. wt 11 000 Da ({beta}2-microglobulin) 0.6; CA210 sieving coefficient negligible]. Methods: Sixteen patients were divided into two groups to receive dialysis with AN140 for 1 week followed by CA210 or vice versa. Before and after the third dialysis with each membrane, plasma lipid and lipoprotein concentrations were measured. Post-dialysis post-heparin lipase activity was measured in six patients. Results: Fifteen patients completed the study. No difference between dialysers was found for apolipoprotein (apo) A1, B or total cholesterol measurements. The rise in triglyceride post-dialysis was attenuated by AN140 (rise 0.05±0.4 mmol/l vs CA210 0.44±0.54 mmol/l, P=0.03), while high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol was increased by AN140 (rise 0.18±0.12 mmol/l vs CA210 0.06±0.14 mmol/l, P<0.02). ApoE rose with AN140 during dialysis but declined with CA210 (1.10±1.06 mg/dl and -0.77±0.63 mg/dl, P=0.002) as did apoCIII (HDL) (AN140 rise 1.33±2.06 mg/dl; CA210 fall -0.67±0.73 mg/dl, P=0.001). Lpl activity, measured in six patients, tended to be higher for AN140 (45.3±10.5 mmol FFA/ml plasma/h vs CA 210 (37.2±7.9 mmol FFA/ml plasma/h) (P=0.16). Conclusions: We conclude that low-flux dialysis using a cellulose acetate membrane with good clearance of higher molecular weight molecules may be associated with beneficial changes in plasma lipids and lipoproteins. Key words: apolipoprotein; cellulose acetate; dialysis; lipids; lipoprotein lipase
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
D. Brancaccio, C. Tetta, M. Gallieni, and V. Panichi
Inflammation, CRP, calcium overload and a high calcium-phosphate product: a liaison dangereuse'
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., February 1, 2002; 17(2): 201 - 203.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
A. A. House, G. A. Wells, J. G. Donnelly, S. P. Nadler, and P. C. Hebert
Randomized trial of high-flux vs low-flux haemodialysis: effects on homocysteine and lipids
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., July 1, 2000; 15(7): 1029 - 1034.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.