Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Krisper, P.
Right arrow Articles by Polaschegg, H. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Krisper, P.
Right arrow Articles by Polaschegg, H. D.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nephrol Dial Transplant (2003) 18: 2082-2087
© 2003 European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association


Original Article

Prediction of time-averaged concentration of haemoglobin in haemodialysis patients

Peter Krisper1, Franz Quehenberger2, Daniel Schneditz3, Herwig Holzer1 and Hans Dietrich Polaschegg4

1Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, 2Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Documentation, 3Department of Physiology, University of Graz, Graz and 4Medical Devices Consultant, Köstenberg, Austria

Correspondence and offprint requests to: Peter Krisper, MD, Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 27, A-8036 Graz, Austria. Email: peter.krisper{at}uni-graz.at

Background. Haemoglobin (Hb) concentration is not stable in most haemodialysis patients due to ultrafiltration-induced haemoconcentration. Pre-dialysis Hb concentrations might therefore significantly deviate from the time-averaged concentration (Hb-tac) which is more likely to represent the patients ‘true’ Hb. This study was performed to quantify these differences in our chronic haemodialysis population and to develop a formula for prediction of Hb-tac.

Methods. In 55 stable patients, serial blood samples were taken over a period of 2 weeks before and immediately after each haemodialysis as well as 30 min post-haemodialysis to account for post-dialytic fluid rebound. Hb-tac was calculated for every patient from the area under the time-dependent Hb curve. We compared the differences between Hb-tac and pre-dialysis Hb (Hb-pre) and various prediction formulae for Hb-tac generated by multiple linear regression analysis which included Hb-pre and post-dialysis Hb (Hb-post) and/or ultrafiltration rate (UFR).

Results. Mean Hb-pre after the long dialysis interval was significantly lower than after the short interval (11.47 vs 11.85 g/dl, P < 0.0001), both underestimating mean Hb-tac (11.97 g/dl). More interestingly, Hb-pre after the long interval deviated >0.5 g/dl from Hb-tac in 50% of measurements. After the short interval, 20% still lay outside this tolerance range. The best formula to predict Hb-tac was Hb-pre x 0.5 + Hb-post x 0.38 + 1.28 (6% outside ± 0.5 g/dl). Hb-pre +(Hb-post – Hb-pre)/3 may be used for quick estimation of Hb-tac.

Conclusions. Hb-tac can be predicted from pre- and post-dialysis blood samples after the short interval, using a simple new formula. Because Hb-tac more reliably reflects a ‘true’ Hb level of haemodialysis patients, it represents a potentially useful tool for future scientific and clinical work.

Keywords: haemodialysis; haemoglobin; post-dialysis; prediction; target; time averaged


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.