Nephrol Dial Transplant (2003) 18: 2105-2111
© 2003 European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association
Original Article
Effects of biofilm formation on haemodialysis monitor disinfection
1Department of Nephrology, Dialysis and Renal Transplantation, University Hospital of Modena, Modena and 2Bellco S.p.A., Mirandola, Italy
Correspondence and offprint requests to: Ciro Tetta, MD, Renal Research, Division of Medicine, Fresenius Medical Care, Else Kroener Strasse 1, D-63152 Bad Homburg, Germany. Email: Ciro.Tetta{at}fmc-ag.com
Background. Biofilms are composed of communities of micro-organisms adhering to essentially any surface. We evaluated whether biofilm formation in the hydraulic circuit of a purposely contaminated haemodialysis monitor would modify the efficacy of different disinfection modalities against bacteria and endotoxin concentrations.
Methods. A water-borne Pseudomonas aeruginosa (109) suspension was recirculated for 1 h and was left standing for 72 h (stationary phase) in the hydraulic circuit of the monitor. The monitor was then washed and disinfected by different physical (heat, 85°C) or chemical (hypochlorite or peracetic acid) disinfection modalities (protocol A). In protocol B, the bacterial suspension was also recirculated for 1 h, but the monitor was then immediately washed and disinfected by different chemical disinfection modalities (hypochlorite or peracetic acid).
Results. Biofilm formation was revealed by scanning and confocal laser electron microscopy after the stationary phase (protocol A), but was absent when the monitor was immediately washed and disinfected (protocol B). In the presence of biofilm (protocol A), heat in association with citric acid was the most effective modality for reducing both colony forming units and endotoxin concentrations, whereas heat by itself was the least effective method of disinfection. Dwelling (60 h) with diluted peracetic acid completely prevented the formation of biofilm. In the absence of biofilm (protocol B), chemical disinfection proved to be effective against both colony forming units and endotoxin concentrations.
Conclusions. We found that biofilm formation may markedly reduce the efficacy of presently available disinfection modalities. Therefore, different disinfection modalities and the combined action of descaling (by citric acid) and disinfection (physical/chemical agents) should be used periodically in haemodialysis monitors. In addition, dwelling with diluted peracetic acid should be adopted whenever monitors are not in use.
Keywords: biofilm; contamination; cytokine; disinfection; microinflammation; monitor
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  T. W. Loehfelm, N. R. Luke, and A. A. Campagnari Identification and Characterization of an Acinetobacter baumannii Biofilm-Associated Protein J. Bacteriol., February 1, 2008; 190(3): 1036 - 1044. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 G. Cappelli, C. Tetta, and B. Canaud Is biofilm a cause of silent chronic inflammation in haemodialysis patients? A fascinating working hypothesis Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., February 1, 2005; 20(2): 266 - 270. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|