Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (11)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fernández-Fresnedo, G.
Right arrow Articles by Arias, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fernández-Fresnedo, G.
Right arrow Articles by Arias, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nephrol Dial Transplant (2003) 18: 990-995
© 2003 European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association

Relationship of donor-specific class-I anti-HLA antibodies detected by ELISA after kidney transplantation on the development of acute rejection and graft survival

Gema Fernández-Fresnedo1, Jose Manuel Pastor2, Marcos López-Hoyos3, Juan Carlos Ruiz1, Juan Antonio Zubimendi1, Julio Gonzalez-Cotorruelo1, Emilio Rodrigo1, Angel L. M. De Francisco1 and Manuel Arias1,

1 Nephrology, 2 Haematology and Haemotherapy and 3 Immunology Units, ‘Marqués de Valdecilla’ Hospital, University of Cantabria, Santander, Spain

Background. The objective of this study was to evaluate the role of post-transplant donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DS-HLA Abs) detected by an ELISA method on long-term graft survival.

Methods. The serum pre-/post-transplant profile of anti-HLA Abs was analysed in 71 renal transplant patients by ELISA. The HLA specificity of positive sera was analysed by a different ELISA method. According to the results, patients were classified into two different groups: those who either developed DS-HLA Abs or significantly increased their panel-reactive antibody (PRA) (group A) and those who did not (group B).

Results. Thirteen out of 71 patients showed post-transplant DS-HLA Abs and were included in group A, whereas the remaining 58 were placed in group B. The incidence of acute rejection (AR) was significantly higher in group A than in group B (77 vs 10%). In addition, seven out of eight patients from group A had graft loss secondary to AR, whereas one of nine grafts lost in group B was due to AR. When analysing the clinical outcome according to HLA class specificity, only patients with HLA-I Abs lost their grafts due to vascular AR. The remaining patients with HLA-II Abs who lost their grafts also had HLA-I Abs. In four of the eight patients who lost their grafts, DS HLA-I Abs were detected several days before AR.

Conclusions. The detection of DS HLA-I Abs in the post-transplant period may provide a good marker for AR and graft loss due to immunological origin. Monitorization of these Abs by ELISA may be a useful tool for tailoring immunosuppression after kidney transplantation.

Keywords: acute rejection; anti-HLA antibodies; kidney transplantation; post-transplant

Correspondence and offprint requests to: Dr Manuel Arias, Servicio de Nefrologia, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, E-39008 Santander, Spain. Email: nefarm{at}humv.es


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
M. Muro, S. Llorente, L. Marin, M. R. Moya-Quiles, M. J. Gonzalez-Soriano, A. Prieto, L. Gimeno, and M. R. Alvarez-Lopez
Acute vascular rejection mediated by HLA antibodies in a cadaveric kidney recipient: discrepancies between FlowPRATM, ELISA and CDC vs luminex screening
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., January 1, 2005; 20(1): 223 - 226.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.