Skip Navigation

Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 2004 19(12):2971-2980; doi:10.1093/ndt/gfh501
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (11)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mircescu, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mircescu, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nephrol Dial Transplant Vol. 19 No. 12 © ERA-EDTA 2004; all rights reserved


Dialysis and Transplantation News

Nephrology and renal replacement therapy in Romania—transition still continues (Cinderella story revisited)

Gabriel Mircescu1,2, Dimitrie Capsa2, Maria Covic2, Mirela Gherman Caprioara2, Gheorghe Gluhovschi2, Ovidiu Golea2, Nicolae Ursea1, Liliana Gârneata1, Vasile Cepoi3, Nicolae Constantinovici1 and Adrian Covic2,3 for the Romanian Renal Registry

1 ‘Dr. Carol Davila’ University Hospital of Nephrology, Bucharest, 2 Romanian Society of Nephrology and 3 Dialysis and Transplantation Center, University Hospital, ‘Dr. C.I. Parhon’, Iasi, Romania

Correspondence and offprint requests to: Adrian Covic, MD PhD, Professor of Nephrology, Parhon University Hospital, 50 Carol 1st Blvd, Iasi 6600, Romania. Email: acovic{at}xnet.ro

Introduction. This report describes the current status of nephrology and renal replacement therapy (RRT) in Romania, a country with previously limited facilities, highlighting national changes in the European context.

Methods. Trends in RRT development were analysed in 2003, on a national basis, using the same questionnaires as in previous surveys (1991, 1995). Survival data and prognostic risk factors were calculated retrospectively from a large representative sample of 2284 patients starting RRT between January 1, 1995 and December 31, 2001 (44% of the total RRT population investigated).

Results. In 2003, RRT incidence [128 per million population (p.m.p.)] and prevalence (250 p.m.p.) were six and five times higher, respectively, than in 1995. The annual rate of increase in the stock of RRT patients (11%) was supported mainly by an exponential development of the continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) population (+600%), while the haemodialysis (HD) growth rate was stable (+33%) and renal transplantation made a marginal contribution. Renal care infrastructure followed the same trend: nephrology departments (+100%) and nephrologists (+205%). The characteristics of RRT incident patients changed accordingly to current European epidemiology (increasing age and prevalence of diabetes and nephroangiosclerosis). The estimated overall survival of RRT patients in Romania was 90.6% at 1 year [confidence interval (CI) 89.4–91.8] and 62.2% at 5 years (CI 59.4–65.0). Patients' survival was negatively influenced (Cox regression analysis) by age >65 years (P<0.001), lack of pre-dialysis monitoring by a nephrologist [P = 0.01, hazards ratio (HR) = 0.8], severe anaemia, lack of erythropoetin treatment (P<0.001, HR = 0.6), and co-morbidity, e.g. cardiovascular diseases (P<0.001, HR = 1.8) and diabetes mellitus (P<0.001, HR = 2.2).

Conclusions. Although the rate of increase in RRT patient stock in 1996–2003 in Romania was the highest in Europe, the prevalence remained below the European mean. As CAPD had the greatest expansion, followed by HD, an effective transplantation programme must be set up to overcome the imbalance. The quality of RRT appears to be good and survival was similar to that in other registries. Further evolution implies strategies of prevention, based on national surveys, supported by the Romanian Renal Registry.

Keywords: CAPD; HD; registry; renal replacement therapy; survival; transplantation


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
A. Covic, N. Mardare, P. Gusbeth-Tatomir, O. Prisada, R. Sascau, and D. J. A. Goldsmith
Arterial wave reflections and mortality in haemodialysis patients--only relevant in elderly, cardiovascularly compromised?
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., October 1, 2006; 21(10): 2859 - 2866.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
A. Covic, A. Schiller, C. Volovat, G. Gluhovschi, P. Gusbeth-Tatomir, L. Petrica, I.-D. Caruntu, G. Bozdog, S. Velciov, V. Trandafirescu, et al.
Epidemiology of renal disease in Romania: a 10 year review of two regional renal biopsy databases
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., February 1, 2006; 21(2): 419 - 424.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
G. Mircescu, L. Garneata, C. Capusa, and N. Ursea
Intravenous iron supplementation for the treatment of anaemia in pre-dialyzed chronic renal failure patients
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., January 1, 2006; 21(1): 120 - 124.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.