Skip Navigation


NDT Advance Access originally published online on December 23, 2004
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 2005 20(2):329-335; doi:10.1093/ndt/gfh602
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
20/2/329    most recent
gfh602v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Antus, B.
Right arrow Articles by Heemann, U.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Antus, B.
Right arrow Articles by Heemann, U.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nephrol Dial Transplant Vol. 20 No. 2 © ERA–EDTA 2004; all rights reserved


Original Article

Effects of progesterone and selective oestrogen receptor modulators on chronic allograft nephropathy in rats

Balazs Antus1,2, Shanying Liu1, Yousheng Yao1, Hequn Zou1, Erwei Song1, Jens Lutz1 and Uwe Heemann1

1 Department of Nephrology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, D-81576 Munich, Germany and 2 Semmelweis University, Department of Pathophysiology, H-1089 Budapest, Hungary

Correspondence and offprint requests to: Balazs Antus MD, PhD, Semmelweis University, Department of Pathophysiology, Nagyvarad ter 4, H-1089 Budapest, Hungary. Email: antbal{at}net.sote.hu

Background. We recently demonstrated that oestrogens ameliorate the progression of chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN). In our present study, we investigated the role of progesterone and selective oestrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) in this process.

Methods. Female Fisher (F344) kidneys were orthotopically transplanted into intact or ovariectomized female Lewis recipients. Ovariectomized recipients were divided into four groups and were treated with either progesterone alone or in combination with oestradiol, oestradiol alone or vehicle. Intact recipients were divided into three groups and were treated with SERMs such as tamoxifen and one of its new derivatives, droloxifene or vehicle. Animals were harvested 24 weeks after transplantation for histological and immunohistological studies as well as for molecular analysis.

Results. Administration of progesterone resulted in increased urinary protein excretion as well as profound glomerulosclerosis and mononuclear cell infiltration. The combined treatment had similar detrimental effects on the development of CAN. In contrast, oestradiol treatment alone improved graft function, reduced glomerulosclerosis and diminished cellular infiltration. SERMs again impaired allograft function and promoted the development of CAN. Renal allograft damage paralleled intragraft mRNA expression of transforming growth factor-ß1 in all groups.

Conclusions. Our results suggest that addition of progesterone diminishes the beneficial effects of oestrogens on the development of CAN in rats. Similarly to progesterone, SERMs worsened long-term renal allograft outcome.

Keywords: chronic allograft nephropathy; growth factor; oestradiol; progesterone


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol.Home page
S. Tiwari, S. Riazi, and C. A. Ecelbarger
Insulin's impact on renal sodium transport and blood pressure in health, obesity, and diabetes
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, October 1, 2007; 293(4): F974 - F984.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
R. H. Straub
The Complex Role of Estrogens in Inflammation
Endocr. Rev., August 1, 2007; 28(5): 521 - 574.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.