Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (16)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schwarz, A.
Right arrow Articles by Keller, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schwarz, A.
Right arrow Articles by Keller, F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nephrol Dial Transplant (1992) 7: 427-432
© 1992 European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association


research-article

Analgesic nephropathy and renal transplantation

A. Schwarz, G. Offermann and F. Keller

Department of Internal Medicine, Klinikum Steglitz, Free University Berlin, Germany

Correspondence and offprint requests to: Dr Anke Schwarz, Medizinische Klinik, Klinikum Steglitz, Hindenburgdamm 30, D-1000 Berlin 45, Germany

Analgesic nephropathy was the most frequent diagnosis in 324 haemodialysis patients (30%) and the second most frequent diagnosis in 900 transplant patients (17%) at the Klinikum Steglitz, Berlin. Analgesic patients were the oldest group among haemodialysis and transplanted patients; the analgesic patients on haemodialysis were significantly older than the transplanted analgesic patients (55.9 ± 11.2 versus 50.5±7.5 years, P=10–6). Patient and graft survival under cyclosporin treatment are not statistically different in 125 transplantations of 109 patients with analgesic nephropathy compared to 508 transplantations of 423 patients with other renal diseases (5-year patient survival, 83.3 ±5.1% versus 88.4±2.4%; 5-year graft survival, 53.5 ± 7.4% versus 56.8 ± 3.8%; NS). Acetaminophen in urine was found in two of 30 analgesic and in one of 54 other patients with a functioning transplant (6.7% versus 1.9%NS). As a sign of compliance, the mean cyclosporin trough level of 17 patients with analgesic nephropathy did not differ significantly from that of 14 patients with polycystic kidney disease (136.4±16.4 versus 139.4±17.3 ng/ml; NS), nor did the mean tandard deviation of the individual measurements (36.7 ±36.8 versus 27.5 ±20.7 ng/ml; NS). Urothelial carcinoma was significantly more frequent in patients with analgesic nephropathy than in those with other renal diseases despite cystoscopy and retrograde pyelography before transplantation (3.7% versus 0.32% P=0.001). Vascular disease was the cause of death in 19 of 44 analgesic transplant patients who died (43.2%). Despite the high age and well-known arteriosclerosis in patients with analgesic nephropathy, patient and graft survival are comparable to that of other patients after renal transplantation. Urothelial carcinoma should be routinely excluded before transplantation.

Keywords: analgesic nephropathy; renal transplantation; cyclosporin; further abuse; urothelial carcinoma


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CJASNHome page
S. H. Chang, T. H. Mathew, and S. P. McDonald
Analgesic Nephropathy and Renal Replacement Therapy in Australia: Trends, Comorbidities and Outcomes
Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., May 1, 2008; 3(3): 768 - 776.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.Home page
P. MICHIELSEN and P. D. SCHEPPER
Trends of Analgesic Nephropathy in Two High-Endemic Regions with Different Legislation
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., March 1, 2001; 12(3): 550 - 556.
[Abstract] [Full Text]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.