Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (36)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Viglino, G.
Right arrow Articles by Giangrande, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Viglino, G.
Right arrow Articles by Giangrande, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nephrol Dial Transplant (1994) 9: 1443-1448
© 1994 European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association


research-article

Ten years experience of CAPD in diabetics: comparison of results with non-diabetics

G. Viglino1,, G. C. Cancarini1, L. Catizone1, R. Cocchi1, A. De Vecchi1, A. Lupo1, M. Salomone2, G. P. Segoloni2, Italian Cooperative Peritoneal Dialysis Study Group* and A. Giangrande3

1Scientific Committee 2Registry Committee 3Chairman

Correspondence and offprint requests to: Correspondence and offprint requests to: Dr Giusto Viglino, Servizio di Nefrologia e Dialisi USSL 65, Ospedale S.Lazzaro, via P.Belli 26, 12051, Alba, Italy

CAPD outcomes were compared between a group of 301 diabetic patients (mean age±SD, 58.9±12.7 years, 55.8% males) and a group of 1689 non-diabetic patients (mean age±SD 57.8±14.8 years, 55.9% males) treated in 30 centres participating in the Italian Cooperative Peritoneal Dialysis Study Group from 1980 to 1989, with follow-up observation periods of 444 years (mean±SD, 1.48± 1.24) and of 3502 years (mean±SD, 2.07± 1.91) respectively.

CAPD was the first modality for 87.2% of diabetics and 78.1% of non-diabetics (P<<0.001). The percentage of patients who needed a partner for CAPD was 45.9% in diabetics and 30.2% in non-diabetics (P<0.00l).

In diabetics compared with non-diabetics, cardiovas cular diseases and cachexia were nearly twice and infections other than peritonitis more than three times as frequent in causing death. In diabetics, survival was significantly worse (P<0.0001) and the relative risk of death 2.13 times higher (P<0.001).

The technique survival and the relative risk of drop out were not significantly different in the two groups. Clinical problems were the most important cause of drop-out among diabetics. The probability and relative risk of drop-out due to peritonitis, as well as of the first peritonitis episode, were not significantly different between the two groups and between diabetics using or not using intraperitoneal insulin.

Days per patient year of hospitalization, excluding the first, were 18.4 in diabetics and 14.3 in non diabetics. CAPD-related problems caused hospitalization in a similar way in the two groups.

In conclusion, compared to non-diabetics on CAPD, diabetics on the same treatment showed more clinical problems that account for a higher need of partner, death, and hospitalization and are the first reason for technique failure; on the other hand, problems closely related to the CAPD technique seem to occur with the same frequency in the two groups.

Keywords: CAPD; diabetes; peritoneal dialysis

*PARTICIPATING CENTRES: P. L. Cavalli, G. Viglino (Alba); V. Mioli, V. Lombardo (Ancona); G. Mecca, G. Tiraboschi (Bergamo); P. Zucchelli, L. Catizone (Osp. Malpighi-Bologna); R. Maiorca, G. C. Cancarini (Brescia); A. Giangrande, F. Caligara (Busto Arsizio); F. Altieri, G. Sau (Cagliari); P. Ghezzi, S. Meinero (Cuneo); G. Surian, R. Scanziani (Desio); A. Passione, M. Querques (Foggia); F. Giacchino, P. Belardi (lvrea); F. Locatelli, P. Marai (Lecco); C. Baroni, R. Tarchini (Mantova); C. Grassi, E. Orazi (Melegnano); G. D'Amico, M. G. Gentile (Osp. S. Carlo-Milano); C. Ponticelli, A. De Vecch, (Osp. Policlinico-Milano); G. Barbiano di Belgioioso, S. Bertoli (Osp. Saccö. Milano) B. Redaelli, C. Dadone (Monza); A. Ramello, M. Bruno (Pinerolo); M. Fusaroli, R. Cocchi (Ravenna); P. Borgatti, C. Lidner (Reggio Emilia); S. Carozzi, M. G. Nasini (Savona); A. Scatizzi, P. Strippoli (Taranto); A. Vercellone, G. P. Segoloni (Osp. Molinette. Torino); G. Piccoli, F. Quarello (Osp. G. Bosco-Torino); C. Rovati, A. Niccolini (Trento); C. Dalla Rosa, C. Bocci (Treviso); G. Mioni, A. Favazza (Udine); G. Maschio, A. Lupo (Verona); A. Sessa, A. Tommasi (Vimercate).


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
M. K. Menon, D. M. Naimark, J. M. Bargman, S. I. Vas, and D. G. Oreopoulos
Long-term blood pressure control in a cohort of peritoneal dialysis patients and its association with residual renal function
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., November 1, 2001; 16(11): 2207 - 2213.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.