NDT Advance Access originally published online on August 25, 2006
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 2006 21(10):2681-2683; doi:10.1093/ndt/gfl418
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© The Author [2006]. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of ERA-EDTA. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org
Translating knowledge of the human genome into clinical practice in nephrology dialysis and transplantation: the renal genome network (ReGeNet)
1Department of Medicine, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK, 2Baxter Novum, Department of Clinical Science, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital Huddinge, Stockholm, Sweden, 3Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Centre and 4Department of Pathology, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
Correspondence and offprint requests to: Prof. Paul Brenchley, Renal Research Labs, Manchester Institute of Nephrology and Transplantation, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9WL, UK. Email: paul.brenchley@manchester.ac.uk
Keywords: genetic association; human genome; network; regenet; renal disease
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
The success of unravelling the human genome in 2001 [1] has provided clinical researchers with an estimate of the number of genes, their relative position on chromosomes and access to the entire nucleotide sequence. Despite the promises of the daily press/news that this achievement heralds the introduction of genetically tailored treatment and the answer to every known disease, the reality of the situation is very different. Six years later, nephrologists may justifiably ask how this knowledge of the human genome has had impact on their clinical practices and may correctly conclude that it has made, as yet, a little impact. While encouraging advances have been made in relation to single-gene disorders for a large majority of the renal patient population, renal damage and its complications should be considered as complex traits with contributions of multiple genetic and environmental factors. So, facing this complexity, what is required to translate
| Developing new knowledge |
|---|
| Developing new ways of working together as a renal research community |
|---|
| Designing specific renal research programmes |
|---|
Related articles in NDT:
- DNA polymorphisms and renal disease: a critical appraisal of studies presented at the annual ERA/EDTA and ASN conferences in 2004 and 2005
- Adrian Mondry, Marie Loh, Kevin Ben Laurence, and Nelson Low
NDT 2006 21: 2775-2779.[Abstract] [FREE Full Text]