Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (11)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Matsumoto, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Maeda, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Matsumoto, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Maeda, K.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, Vol 13, Issue 11 2861-2866, Copyright © 1998 by Oxford University Press


ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Peripheral deletion of &ggr;&dgr; T cells in haemodialysis patients

Y Matsumoto, T Shinzato, I Takai, A Nishimoto, S Nakai, T Sakai, I Amano and K Maeda
Department of Internal Medicine, Nagoya University Daiko Medical Center, 1-1-20 Diko-minami, Higashi-ku, Nagoya 461, Japan; 1st Department of Internal Medicine, Nagoya University School of Medicine and Department of Hemodialysis, Shakaihoken-Chukyo Hospital, Nagoya, Japan; Corresponding author

Many patients with end-stage renal disease have altered host defenses against infectious agents. We have demonstrated that T cells, which play an important role in the immunological response, may undergo apoptosis by the Fas system in uraemia. To elucidate whether &ggr;&dgr; T cells, which function as a first defense against intracellular pathogens, are altered in number or characteristics in dialysis patients surface expressions of TCR, LFA-1 and Fas antigen on peripheral T cells were examined by immunofluorescence analysis. We demonstrated the proportions of peripheral &ggr;&dgr; T cells are altered significantly in haemodialysis (HD) patients. Interestingly, there were marked differences in the levels of expression of LFA-1 and Fas antigen between the two types of T cells. Moreover both the expression of LFA-1 and that of Fas antigen were enhanced significantly in HD patients compared with normal controls. These results suggest that circulating &ggr;&dgr; T cells may be susceptible to activation-induced cell death in comparison with &agr;{beta} T cells in uraemic environments. Key words: end-stage renal disease; FAS; &ggr;&dgr; T cells; LFA-1
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
H. Vacher-Coponat, C. Brunet, L. Lyonnet, E. Bonnet, A. Loundou, J. Sampol, V. Moal, B. Dussol, P. Brunet, Y. Berland, et al.
Natural killer cell alterations correlate with loss of renal function and dialysis duration in uraemic patients
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., April 1, 2008; 23(4): 1406 - 1414.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
P. Trzonkowski, A. Debska-Slizien, E. Szmit, J. Mysliwska, K. Szymanska, L. Hak, A. Mysliwski, and B. Rutkowski
Long-term therapy with recombinant human erythropoietin increases CD8+ T-cell apoptosis in haemodialysis patients
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., February 1, 2005; 20(2): 367 - 376.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Leukoc. Biol.Home page
B. L. Jaber, M. C Perianayagam, V. S Balakrishnan, A. J King, and B. J. G. Pereira
Mechanisms of neutrophil apoptosis in uremia and relevance of the Fas (APO-1, CD95)/Fas ligand system
J. Leukoc. Biol., June 1, 2001; 69(6): 1006 - 1012.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
J. E. Scherberich and W. A. Nockher
Blood monocyte phenotypes and soluble endotoxin receptor CD14 in systemic inflammatory diseases and patients with chronic renal failure
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., May 1, 2000; 15(5): 574 - 578.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.