Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (15)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Arici, M.
Right arrow Articles by Caglar, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Arici, M.
Right arrow Articles by Caglar, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nephrol Dial Transplant (2000) 15: 1847-1851
© 2000 European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association

Bone mineral density in haemodialysis patients: A comparative study of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and quantitative ultrasound

Mustafa Arici1,, Hakan Erturk2, Bulent Altun1, Celalettin Usalan1, Sukru Ulusoy1, Yunus Erdem1, Aysen Sivri2, Unal Yasavul1, Cetin Turgan1 and Sali Caglar1

1 Hacettepe University, School of Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology and 2 Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, Ankara, Turkey

Background. Quantitative ultrasound (QUS) of bone is a relatively new technique that appears to assess ‘bone quality' in addition to bone mineral density. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic potential of QUS of calcaneum and to correlate it with dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) in chronic haemodialysis patients.

Methods. Broad-band ultrasound attenuation (BUA; dB/MHz) and speed of sound (SOS; m/s) of calcaneum and DEXA (g/cm2) measurements of the lumbar spine and hip were made in 39 patients. The indices obtained by either method were compared with age-and sex-matched controls. Calcaneal measurements were correlated to DEXA and relevant clinical and biochemical data of patients.

Results. BUA and SOS values were markedly reduced in dialysis patients compared to controls (59.1±13.8 vs 73.0±16.2 dB/MHz, P<0.001 and 1533±28 vs 1560±29 m/s, P=0.014 respectively). There was a moderate, but significant association between calcaneal parameters and DEXA (r=0.32–0.53, P<0.05). Both BUA and SOS scores were inversely correlated with age (r=-0.69, P<0.001) and duration of menopause (r=-0.74, P<0.01). Additionally, BUA values showed a moderate negative association with serum intact parathyroid values (r=-0.38, P=0.018).

Conclusion. Chronic haemodialysis patients have reduced calcaneal BUA and SOS scores. QUS of the calcaneum is an easy-to-apply and radiation-free technique. It could be a useful substitute for assessment of bone density in such patients. However, further studies in large patient groups and comparisons with plasma markers of bone turnover and bone biopsy findings are needed to assess its potential place in the management of renal osteodystrophy.

Keywords: bone mineral density; calcaneal ultrasound; dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry; haemodialysis; quantitative ultrasound

Correspondence and offprint requests to: Mustafa Arici MD, Hacettepe Hastahanesi, Nefroloji Bolumu, 06100 Sihhiye, Ankara, Turkey.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ptjournalHome page
M. K Hastings, D. R Sinacore, F. A Fielder, and J. E Johnson
Bone Mineral Density During Total Contact Cast Immobilization for a Patient With Neuropathic (Charcot) Arthropathy
Physical Therapy, March 1, 2005; 85(3): 249 - 256.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.