NDT Advance Access originally published online on October 12, 2004
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 2004 19(12):2961-2964; doi:10.1093/ndt/gfh510
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nephrol Dial Transplant Vol. 19 No. 12 © ERA-EDTA 2004; all rights reserved
Editorial Comment
Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy
Department of Transplantation, Guy's Hospital, London, UK
Correspondence and offprint requests to: Mr Nizam Mamode, Clinical Transplantation, New Guy's House, Guy's Hospital, London SE1 9RT, UK. Email: Nizam.Mamode@gstt.sthames.nhs.uk
Keywords: laparoscopy; live donor nephrectomy
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
| Background |
|---|
Traditional open living donor nephrectomy (ODN) is a safe procedure with a mortality of 0.03% [1]. However, there is significant donor morbidity with acute and chronic wound pain, wound infection, prolonged hospital stay, late return to full activity and a risk of incisional herniae. Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy (LLDN) was introduced <10 years ago in an attempt to minimize these complications, but concerns have been raised about the security of the technique for both donor and recipient, and whether it offers sufficient benefit over modern open techniques, including mini-incision nephrectomy. LLDN remains a technically difficult and complex operation, scoring 16 out of 21 for difficulty in the European Scoring System for Laparoscopic Operations [2].
| Techniques |
|---|
LLDN was first described at Johns Hopkins University by Ratner et al. in 1995 [3] on a 40-year-old man with good results. It may be performed using the hand-assisted method
| Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy vs open surgery |
|---|
| Costs |
|---|
| Complications of laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy |
|---|
Ureteric complications
Graft function
Other complications
| Right-sided donor nephrectomy |
|---|
| Multiple arteries |
|---|
| Hand-assisted vs pure laparoscopic nephrectomy |
|---|
| Training |
|---|
| Conclusions |
|---|